The last 18 months have consisted of the most blatant collusion between governments, the media, and corporations in history all in order to consolidate power and wealth respectively. It dwarfs the flagrantly unconstitutional collaboration of private money, mostly supplied by Mark Zuckerberg, and local Democrat politicians in order to boost voter turnout in certain demographics. Even more astonishing than the elite’s brazenness required to try such a scheme, is the willful ignorance of so many across the globe required to allow their charade to continue.
As the Delta variant spreads (and the Lambda variant has been introduced), leaders worldwide are toying with the idea of locking down their countries again in spite of the overwhelming evidence that it is ineffective. A study from statisticians at Ludwig Maximilians Munich University found that quarantining healthy people did not help control the pandemic. This would be obvious since quarantine historically only applied to people who were infected and symptomatic.
Despite the ever-growing library of evidence against lockdowns Los Angeles, Canada, New Zealand, and others have reinstated their restrictive measures. There is not a data-based reason to go back into lockdowns. In Canada for example, the lockdown measures are supposed to be lifted on July 19th, but there is a push within the government to delay that date given the rising number of cases.
The number of cases is irrelevant if you remember back at the beginning of this nightmare it was to prevent the healthcare industry from being overrun. How is the Canadian hospital system doing? One of the hospitals in Toronto, Michael Garron, currently has 3 hospitalized Covid-19 patients out of 17,906 reported cases at the hospital since March 12, 2020. Clearly, the healthcare system could hardly be less overrun, which begs the question of why has Canada remained locked down, as well as why is anyone advocating it be extended?
Canada is not the only country where the costs of lockdowns seem impossible to defend when looking at the data. The United Kingdom is another example, “[a]s the Government assesses the pros and cons of vaccinating children against Covid, new data has revealed that just 25 under-18s in England died from the virus between March 2020 and February 2021. This equates to an absolute risk of one in 481,000. In the same period, 124 children died from suicide and 268 died from trauma. Researchers suggest that lockdown ‘may prove a greater risk than… SARS-CoV-2 itself.’” Yet, despite these low numbers, we have the media, government, celebrities, and companies screaming at anyone who will listen about how dangerous the virus is while simultaneously hiding the dangers associated with the Covid vaccine.
According to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) there have already been 56,970 urgent care visits, 26,818 hospitalization, and 9,048 deaths connected to the Covid Vaccine. These numbers dwarf the numbers of every other vaccine ever administered to the public since the 1990s when the government started correcting information via the VAERS. This would be ample evidence such that failure to disclose the risks would borderline on medical malpractice, but the known ineffectiveness of the VAERS at catching reactions to vaccines make this even more concerning. According to, The Clinical Impact of Adverse Event Reporting, published in the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC)
Another major concern with any spontaneous reporting system is underreporting of adverse events. It has been estimated that rarely more than 10% of serious ADRs, and 2-4% of non-serious reactions, are reported to the British spontaneous reporting program30. A similar estimate is that the FDA receives by direct report less than 1% of suspected serious ADR. This means that cases spontaneously reported to any surveillance program, which comprise the numerator, generally represent only a small portion of the number that have actually occurred.
So not only is the reported numbers significantly more dangerous than most vaccines, but the system is significantly underreporting how many reactions there are of all levels. Part of the reason for this discrepancy is the lack of autopsies being done on those who die unexpectedly after receiving the vaccine. Jane M. Orient, M.D, raised this as a major concern for healthcare providers’ ability to accurately advise their patients, “But I have seen a report of just one autopsy. This patient had had one dose of the Pfizer shot and died four weeks later. Although there were no characteristic features of COVID-19, almost all tissues tested positive on PCR for SARS-CoV-2”.
One of the latest victims of the Covid Vaccine was an 18-year-old Italian girl, Camilla Canepa, reported to the emergency room one week after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine complaining of severe headaches. The doctor who operated on her, Gianluigi Zona, said that he had never seen something like Camilla’s condition before. He also said, “I’m neither a virologist, nor an epidemiologist, nor a coroner, but given the image I saw in the girl’s head, it is clear that we are dealing with something that is not normal.” Camilla’s story is far from the only one, there are hundreds of stories similar to her’s of young, healthy, people dying suddenly from the
In an April 21 Letter to the Editor titled “SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines are not Free of Neurological Side Effects”, a group of scientists combated the claim from pharmaceutical companies that the vaccine is acceptably safe. They addressed some of the clear ethical issues with the continued rollout of the vaccine without the approval of the FDA, long-term trials, or any of the other procedures being followed. The letter states,
Third, those who produce the vaccines and want to make money with their products may have a weak interest in hearing about the side effects of their products and why they may directly or indirectly try to avoid publications about putative adverse reactions. Fourth, there is enormous social, economic, and political pressure on producers of vaccines and publishers of meeting current needs and providing an effective weapon against the pandemic, why positive reports are preferred over negative news about the handling of the global crisis.
Not only is the Covid vaccine possibly going to kill you, in fact for many age groups it is more likely to do so than the disease itself, but it also is ineffective at preventing you from catching Covid. According to the latest trends from the United Kingdom, most people who are catching the virus are vaccinated.
In particular, the lockdowns, mask mandates, vaccination requirements, and hysteria because of kids is scientifically nonsensical. We have known for a year that kids are less likely to contract, spread, or be symptomatic if they came into contact with Covid which was confirmed by Harvard.
This did not stop many countries from completely isolating children for months on end, the effects of which we still do not fully understand yet, although one is making itself known in New Zealand. According to reports, the children of New Zealand are falling ill at alarming rates, suffering from a variety of different illnesses because they have been isolated for too long. This prevented their immune system from interacting with the natural world which is necessary for it to calibrate and be effective at preventing sickness.
This pandemic has been the greatest scam ever perpetrated on the American people.
Inaccurate models created bad government policy, bad government policy created global fear and totalitarian lockdowns, the lockdowns made us sick, all while we waited on the subsidized vaccine to be required for us to enter the same disease-ridden pre-pandemic world. Now Pfizer is seeking approval for a 6-month booster shot which will propel their 5-year income from the Covid vaccine well over the current estimation of $100 billion.