Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Richard Luthmann's avatar

Here’s the problem—you can’t demand closure while ignoring contradictions. If evidence exists that doesn’t fit the official narrative, it doesn’t just disappear because it’s inconvenient. It lingers. And the longer it lingers without serious examination, the more it erodes confidence. This isn’t about conspiracy—it’s about consistency. If the facts line up, prove it. If they don’t, address it. But don’t expect people to stop asking questions just because the case is old. Time doesn’t settle truth—it just tests it. And when the questions keep coming decades later, that’s not noise. That’s a signal.

anne daniecki's avatar

The best theory I've seen yet is the one presented onganjing.com called breakthrough

8 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?