Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Richard Luthmann's avatar

Here’s the problem—you can’t demand closure while ignoring contradictions. If evidence exists that doesn’t fit the official narrative, it doesn’t just disappear because it’s inconvenient. It lingers. And the longer it lingers without serious examination, the more it erodes confidence. This isn’t about conspiracy—it’s about consistency. If the facts line up, prove it. If they don’t, address it. But don’t expect people to stop asking questions just because the case is old. Time doesn’t settle truth—it just tests it. And when the questions keep coming decades later, that’s not noise. That’s a signal.

Steven Morgan's avatar

I temember that dsy- a great wrong bit committed we all knew it and there’s always been a suspicion that Oswald wasn’t the assassin just a Patsy thank you for writing. A good article. Welfare expanded under Johnson. That’s the biggest expense government has today. It’s a shame isn’t it?

14 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?