Provoked Riots and Planned Wildfires: Inside the Orwellian Reimagining of Los Angeles

As the riots rage, the familiar pattern emerges at the scene of pallets of bricks mysteriously showing up to empower ANTIFA thugs and other detestable leftists to cause as much carnage as possible.

As the riots rage on in Los Angeles, the familiar pattern emerges at the scene of pallets of bricks mysteriously showing up to empower ANTIFA thugs and other detestable leftists to cause as much carnage as possible.

With the fake news media and self-serving political figures like California Governor Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass running cover for the rioters, they are going to be successful in permanently destroying many blocks of the city despite the effective response from the National Guard and Marines deployed wisely by President Trump.

Aside from an agenda to promote chaos to hurt President Trump and hamper his immigration enforcement measures, there is a broader and more insidious plan to cause destruction within the city for the sake of destruction, in order to rebuild in the image of utopian globalism. There is a worldwide impetus for Smart City infrastructure to upend conventional city planning where control can be centralized in a grid that will lend itself to social credit, carbon taxes, biometric scanning and all kinds of Orwellian centralization schemes.

The Duke Report compiled research in the aftermath of the Los Angeles wildfires, which were seemingly elongated by the city response and made worse at every turn to maximize damage. It is easy to dismiss the horrible disaster response as DEI incompetence or the effects of bureaucratic negligence, but oftentime these are convenient smokescreens for a darker, more nefarious agenda that is afoot.

There are wealthy, far-left interests who are both ideologically and financially motivated to support destruction in order to rebuild in their preferred new image. Liberal financier Nicolas Berggruen, a George Soros clone who founded his eponymous NGO the Berggruen Institute in 2010, seized upon the wildfires in order to spread propaganda about the need to rebuild Los Angeles under a vision preferred by groups like the World Economic Forum.

"In order to deal with pressing regional challenges at a deeper level, Southern California needs to fundamentally reconfigure the responsibilities and simplify the lines of authority of its regional government," wrote historian Nils Gilman, the Chief Operating Officer of the Berggruen Institute.

The answer, according to the Berggruen cabal, is a government controlled by a handful of scientific elites who can issue dictates for the greater good without being concerned with pesky public pressure. As was learned during deep state subversion attempts during the first Trump administration, this system is commonly referred to as “democracy” in the modern age despite its obviously authoritarian implications.

The Duke Report points to the classic Hegelian dialectic of problem - reaction - solution that emerged after the wildfires. Whether groups like the Berggruen Institute actually plan these disasters or are merely there to exploit misery and benefit from the panic in the aftermath, their patterns of behavior are predictable and always follow the same template.

In the case of the wildfires, the Berggruen Institute was perfectly positioned to take control. Rooted in futurism, Berggruen Institute senior project advisor Steve Soboroff was put in charge of the wildfire recovery by Mayor Bass, and he made it clear his grandiose ambitions in rebuilding the city.

"We are not going to rebuild to have this happen again. We are going to rebuild with materials dated 2030, even though it's 2025," Soboroff said.

Notice it is never the elites themselves who are at fault for their myriad of policy failures; including: pushing DEI, eliminating meritocracy, deliberately dumbing down the public for the purposes of social control, instituting environmental regulations that make it more difficult to fight wildfires, or the like. The problem is always that they lack sufficient authority and must take more power away from the people as a self-fulfilling prophecy following every catastrophe. Liberal officials, never shy about eschewing responsibility, are happy to play along with the charade.

"Los Angeles is a reflection of the world as it is today and what this country will look like tomorrow. The most improbable collision of cultures, and people and ideas," former Los Angeles Mayor Eric Garcetti said, as quoted by Nicolas Berggruen in an Instagram post.

"For the rebuild," Garcetti said after the fires, "it'll be absolutely critical for us to act like we're one city and not a collection of 88 villages.”

The people’s desire to come together after a crisis is weaponized by politicians and organizations that see decentralization, localism and self-governance as the enemy. Whether it is on the Left with the Berggruen Institute and their re-imagining of Los Angeles or on the Right with the Project for a New American Century and their unprecedented foreign policy expansion after the Sept. 11 attacks, there is no shortage of deranged fantasists shamelessly unwilling to let a crisis go to waste to achieve their own diabolical ends through the brutal force of the State.

MAGA is a wholesale rejection of this type of politics. The populist underpinnings of the Trump revolution show a country sick of its elites, yearning to go back to the way things were – as imperfect as they may have been – rather than embracing the cold, bizarre and unforgiving Brave New World facing them. Many crises will come and go, but MAGA must stubbornly retain its ethos while facing the Hegelian dialectic and its malevolent proponents. The Trump movement must stand like a rock against the current for America and more broadly, the West not to be absorbed by the burgeoning technocracy.