In February of 1972, President Richard Milhous Nixon accomplished what generations of diplomats, academics, and foreign policy mandarins had insisted was impossible.
Beautiful explanation of this topic. You have clarified the quandary I had about President Nixon's motives regarding China. I heard about the triangulation strategy at the time. Knowing Nixon's legacy as a staunch anti-communist, I wondered how he would have felt after his China opening and how we got to this point.
"Engagement without vigilance becomes surrender." Roger that. Former CEO of GE, Jack Welsh took it from a $20 billion company to $200 billion, and wanted things designed in India, made in China, and serviced/marketed in the U.S. Clinton and Bush Jr. just happened to be in charge of the selling out of our country, for a price we are still paying dearly for. As A(eye) starts to hit the white collar jobs, blue collar proles like me have zero sympathy.
Some way or another we need to pull Russia (post Ukraine) into our Western orbit to thwart the Tiger we fed.
Globalism “Rule from Above” Vs. Nationalism “Rule from Below”
Globalism is the “Rule from Above” quest of society’s minority elitists who believe they are best endowed and therefore entitled to make the rules that govern society. Globalism is one form of republican government where representatives represent the will of the elitists. The government of Globalism makes rules that govern over the entirety of all peoples and over the entire world.
Nationalism is the “Rule from Below” quest of the majority of society’s citizens who believe that the rules that govern society should apply equally and indiscriminately to all citizens of the society, and those rules should guarantee and protect each citizen’s Personal Liberty, Personal Rights, especially the Right to Own Property, and the Personal Right to Pursue Personal Prosperity and Personal Happiness. Nationalism is another form of republican government, but where representatives represent the will of the majority of the citizens of the society. The governments of Nationalism make rules that are only applicable to the citizens of an independent sovereign nation enclosed within borders that are well-defined and accepted by all other independent sovereign nations.
The Globalist’s form of government is TECHNOCRACY
TECHNOCRACY = SOCIALISM + FASCISM
Socialism is Centralized control over the Global Society (United Nations).
Fascism is the Centralized control over the Global Economy (World Economic Forum).
Yes, I lived through Nixon “playing the China card” against the Soviets, as the cliche phrase went. But subsequent Presidents didn’t squander his legacy, they galloped into Globalist policy. Why? Because Kissinger peddled his influence to China, and his WEF pal Klaus Schwab went nuts pushing New World Order craziness on his disciples who wanted a weak America. And enmeshed through it all was the Bush Crime Family, from Prescott Bush up to “Dubya”. Newcomers like the Clintons and Obamas of course did their part but they’re not the controllers.
Beautiful explanation of this topic. You have clarified the quandary I had about President Nixon's motives regarding China. I heard about the triangulation strategy at the time. Knowing Nixon's legacy as a staunch anti-communist, I wondered how he would have felt after his China opening and how we got to this point.
Spot on. Everyone after Nixon blundered their way through.
"Engagement without vigilance becomes surrender." Roger that. Former CEO of GE, Jack Welsh took it from a $20 billion company to $200 billion, and wanted things designed in India, made in China, and serviced/marketed in the U.S. Clinton and Bush Jr. just happened to be in charge of the selling out of our country, for a price we are still paying dearly for. As A(eye) starts to hit the white collar jobs, blue collar proles like me have zero sympathy.
Some way or another we need to pull Russia (post Ukraine) into our Western orbit to thwart the Tiger we fed.
What a shame. Everyone after Nixon screwed up. And now look where we are.
Globalism “Rule from Above” Vs. Nationalism “Rule from Below”
Globalism is the “Rule from Above” quest of society’s minority elitists who believe they are best endowed and therefore entitled to make the rules that govern society. Globalism is one form of republican government where representatives represent the will of the elitists. The government of Globalism makes rules that govern over the entirety of all peoples and over the entire world.
Nationalism is the “Rule from Below” quest of the majority of society’s citizens who believe that the rules that govern society should apply equally and indiscriminately to all citizens of the society, and those rules should guarantee and protect each citizen’s Personal Liberty, Personal Rights, especially the Right to Own Property, and the Personal Right to Pursue Personal Prosperity and Personal Happiness. Nationalism is another form of republican government, but where representatives represent the will of the majority of the citizens of the society. The governments of Nationalism make rules that are only applicable to the citizens of an independent sovereign nation enclosed within borders that are well-defined and accepted by all other independent sovereign nations.
The Globalist’s form of government is TECHNOCRACY
TECHNOCRACY = SOCIALISM + FASCISM
Socialism is Centralized control over the Global Society (United Nations).
Fascism is the Centralized control over the Global Economy (World Economic Forum).
UN - WEF Partnership 2019 (Agenda 21/2030)
https://duckduckgo.com/?q=UN+-+WEF+Agenda+21%2F2030&t=h_&ia=web
WEF: Winter Davos in Switzerland
WEF: Summer Davos in China
https://duckduckgo.com/?ia=web&origin=funnel_home_website&t=h_&q=summer+davos+in+china
David Rockefeller’s Trilateral Commission converted China from Communism to Technocracy to be the Laboratory for Globalism
China Is A Technocracy
https://www.technocracy.news/day-7-china-is-a-technocracy/
How The Trilateral Commission Converted China Into A Technocracy
https://www.technocracy.news/trilateral-commission-converted-china-technocracy/
Technocracy In China: The World’s First Technate – Part 1
https://www.technocracy.news/technocracy-in-china-the-worlds-first-technate-part-1/
China Is The World’s First Technate
https://www.technocracy.news/prelude-to-day-7-china-is-the-worlds-first-technate/
Technocracy Was Born In US, Grew Up In China, Now Conquering The World
https://www.technocracy.news/technocracy-was-born-in-us-grew-up-in-china-now-conquering-the-world/
It’s Confirmed: Tyrants LOVE China! . . . But Why?
https://www.corbettreport.com/its-confirmed-tyrants-love-china-but-why/?fbclid=IwAR2DZyFBjV3i73xKPvTHnyzVebMZIF5R2dLjojj_3KNd88aga18CDha6eRA_aem_AaTl6PWKH_fG7kdb-wEn77etNiq_OtSkJBLlkG6Zu19kjJT3Grn-aBy52vhCmXK6XtM&mibextid=Zxz2cZ
BRICS = UN Agenda 21/2030
https://william3n4z2.substack.com/p/brics-un-agenda-212030?utm_source=direct&r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post-expanded-share&utm_medium=post%20viewer
Yes, I lived through Nixon “playing the China card” against the Soviets, as the cliche phrase went. But subsequent Presidents didn’t squander his legacy, they galloped into Globalist policy. Why? Because Kissinger peddled his influence to China, and his WEF pal Klaus Schwab went nuts pushing New World Order craziness on his disciples who wanted a weak America. And enmeshed through it all was the Bush Crime Family, from Prescott Bush up to “Dubya”. Newcomers like the Clintons and Obamas of course did their part but they’re not the controllers.