The issue is not whether Flock cameras can solve crimes. Of course they can. The issue is whether the state may build a suspicionless travel ledger on every citizen and search it later. No. Public roads do not mean public lives. If police want to know where a suspect’s car has been, get a warrant. If prosecutors need the data, make the showing. The Bill of Rights is the regulation. The warrant requirement preserves both law enforcement and liberty. Without it, license-plate readers become general warrants on utility poles — perfect tools for managed decline and political control.
Excellent Richard. Also just because a camera catches one's car driving in a particular road doesn't mean it was the OWNER driving the car. I know this from personal experience.
"What began as a quiet expansion has now triggered a widespread and growing backlash. That backlash is far from irrational. It is the natural response of free people who recognize a fundamental threat to their privacy rights when they see one."
Roger gets at the core of the issue ! Especially as we ( real Americans ) celebrate our 250th 'Birthday'.. and especially the principles and values that were born on that birthday.
Flock cameras record activity on a public street. It is well settled law that individuals have no right to privacy when they are on a public street. If the cameras are banned, then we should also ban everyone's Ring cameras because they also record activity on public streets. The problem I have is not the use by the police to investigate crime, but the Flock corporation selling the information for profit to data centers and advertisers.
This the slippery slope to Constant surveillance under ruthless control! The democRAts dream…
GET The FLOCK GONE
The issue is not whether Flock cameras can solve crimes. Of course they can. The issue is whether the state may build a suspicionless travel ledger on every citizen and search it later. No. Public roads do not mean public lives. If police want to know where a suspect’s car has been, get a warrant. If prosecutors need the data, make the showing. The Bill of Rights is the regulation. The warrant requirement preserves both law enforcement and liberty. Without it, license-plate readers become general warrants on utility poles — perfect tools for managed decline and political control.
its Communism
Excellent Richard. Also just because a camera catches one's car driving in a particular road doesn't mean it was the OWNER driving the car. I know this from personal experience.
Who is driving the car is immaterial. The only relevance is who the car belongs to. Flock cameras only record the rear license plate.
WAKE UP THE MASSES SHARE THIS VIDEO EVERYWHERE
🙏🇺🇸🙏
https://youtu.be/PhFujpXonOg
The first to arrive were the cameras
Installed to protect both you and me
In places where we weren't that threatened
And yet the people didn't see
What followed were traffic restrictions
To keep the roads quiet and clean
The math didn't add up, or the science
But still the people didn't see
Next came the 15 minute neighborhoods
Make our lives easier, decreed
To some, it seemed like restrictions
But still the people didn't see
Then came the Digital ID
So convenient, easy and free!
Your life in one chip on a mainframe
And still the people didn't see
The cars they sold were electric
All wired to the government PC
They switched off the driving on Sundays
Yet still the people didn't see
The banks moved their money to digital
The government banned cash the next week
The ability to fly was restricted
Yet still the people didn't see
They linked up your money and profile
To the ID on the government PC
Connected it to social media
Yet still the people didn't see
Then came a new cure, a new virus
Safe and Effective, and free
They linked these jabs to your profile
And connected the government PC
When the people were locked up in cities
Policed by their digital ID
Unable to visit their loved ones
Now finally the people can see
Restricted and tracked with no money,
To go further a permit you'll need
Contained in your digital city
Oh why did the people not see?!
These steps they sold us as progress
Never looked to be quite what they seemed
If you don't ask the questions and protest
Then your children will never know FREE.
Author recitinv this: https://old.bitchute.com/video/JyxR8dvkVZHk/
Absolutely brilliant! 🎯
To quote directly from Roger above :
"What began as a quiet expansion has now triggered a widespread and growing backlash. That backlash is far from irrational. It is the natural response of free people who recognize a fundamental threat to their privacy rights when they see one."
Roger gets at the core of the issue ! Especially as we ( real Americans ) celebrate our 250th 'Birthday'.. and especially the principles and values that were born on that birthday.
"Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves."
- William Pitt the Younger
Flock cameras record activity on a public street. It is well settled law that individuals have no right to privacy when they are on a public street. If the cameras are banned, then we should also ban everyone's Ring cameras because they also record activity on public streets. The problem I have is not the use by the police to investigate crime, but the Flock corporation selling the information for profit to data centers and advertisers.