As President Trump wisely noted, he is not constrained by so-called international law. He is constrained only by the Constitution of the United States.
Great article. I live in Europe and the old guard that Dutchman Ronald Bernard exposes in his 2017 podcasts are hypocrites and often arrogant. The Rothschild banking clan assumed the USA would protect their investments and provide military might to conflicts generated for the sole purpose of selling weapons and running up public debt (as Kay Griggs, ex-wife of assassin General Griggs, spoke of in her 1998 podcasts). Although Bibi has considerable influence on Donald's decision-making, always to the detriment of Americans and the American military, Trump was correct to force the hand of Denmark, even though it gave Macron a chance to be a paper tiger.
The quality of life Danes enjoyed until the late '90's was among the best in the world.
Their high taxes actually paid for excellent free health care and education.
Most of their food was organic.
Then foreign workers were let in, mostly from North Africa.
They were supposed to only stay a year or so and then go home.
Instead, they took advantage of the Danes generosity and brought in their numerous wives and children, refused to leave, then starting complaining about housing, wages, the usual.
One of my oldest friends who is from DK, her dad who worked all his life and earned a very nice pension, suddenly these people were being given all sorts of help and welfare which was more than what her dad was getting. The pensioners from that time were being ripped off.
Many had small vacation homes on the coasts and enjoyed their lives.
Most people could afford a car, despite all the bikes.
Then they started building wind turbines.
There was almost no poverty and no homeless.
The Muslims from North Africa ruined Denmark.
And the stupid trusting people in the government played into their hands.
Greenland on the other hand has been a sore spot for DK since they took it.
The Inuit People who are related to the Inuit in Canada have been treated like 2nd class citizens ever since.
Iceland and Greenland should have their names switched.
While traveling I was speaking with a young woman from what had been Yugoslavia. Upon hearing that I was American, she became very tearful and asked why America had destroyed her country? Why did America need to drive wedges between families, friends, and neighbors?
The best answer I could give her is Bill Clinton was president, and I felt great shame saying it. To feel accountable for the crimes of those who claim to represent me, I will never forget that moment.
"A victory for globalists" translates as a disaster for everyone else.
The stupid Eurocrats are still operating under the old Treaty of Westphalia, except when they are the aggressors within Europe. If someone else is the aggressor (like President Trump), then it's all an issue of, "We recognize the known boundaries of nations."
Well, the reason the Balkanization exists as a policy is similar to what exists in the US: Gerrymandering. It's all a matter of trying to re-align the borders to political advantage. The Balkans were an example of that, under the influence of the Ottoman Empire. It was only in the aftermath of World War 1 that Yugoslavia was constructed as a nation-state. And Denmark is still under the impression that they will keep control over Greenland.
Foreign policy credibility collapses under double standards. If NATO intervention in Serbia was justified under humanitarian theory, then European leaders cannot suddenly rediscover absolute sovereignty when Greenland becomes strategically relevant. Either self-determination and geopolitical realism apply consistently, or they are tools of convenience. The U.S. Constitution governs American executive power. That is the constraint on a U.S. president — not selectively invoked international norms. Denmark invokes moral authority today, yet supported interventions that redrew borders in the Balkans. You cannot champion intervention when it suits global consensus and condemn leverage when it serves American interests. Consistency, not outrage, defines legitimacy.
The government of Denmark committed genocide in Greenland, specifically para (d) and para (e) of the Article II.
____________________________________
Article II
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with
intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as
such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its
physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
____________________________________
It is well known that Inuit children were kidnapped, not unlike boys kidnapped by Ottoman Turks in the "blood tax" aka "devshirme" and transferred to another group -- Greenlanders to Danes in Denmark Mainland and Serbs, Croats, Bulgars, Albanians to Anadolian Turkey. That is paragraph (e).
Moreover Denmark FORCEFULLY implanted devices disabling pregnancies in hundreds, possibly thousands of Greenlandic women, some even female children of 15. That is paragraph (d).
Teh difference between Danes and Ottomans is the Danes committed genocide after the Convention for its prevention was long in force, including in Denmark.
Trump would be even wiser if he acknowledged that he is constrained by both The Law of Nations and the Constitution. To suggest anything else is both wrong and hypocritical. "Rules for thee but not for me ' - basically "Might is right" - is no way for a modern, civilized nation to behave.
I agree, but it seems only Monaco would fit the bill. Now tell that to the crowds committing violence in our streets that are Muslims trying to kill Jews under the Palestinian flag or the invading aliens out with them in violent riots with mobs pretending to be US citizens or ones that became a citizen only to overthrow the government and eliminate its history and name like La Rasa.
If you feel you can do a better job and solve these and hundreds more then run for President of the USA or at least post them here. Until then you might actually want to say something constructive instead of just bitching. Yes people can also say something constructive to solve a problem having identified the problem but until they do they are just hot gas in the summer heat. At least you're thinking. Try again - do better.
Great article. I live in Europe and the old guard that Dutchman Ronald Bernard exposes in his 2017 podcasts are hypocrites and often arrogant. The Rothschild banking clan assumed the USA would protect their investments and provide military might to conflicts generated for the sole purpose of selling weapons and running up public debt (as Kay Griggs, ex-wife of assassin General Griggs, spoke of in her 1998 podcasts). Although Bibi has considerable influence on Donald's decision-making, always to the detriment of Americans and the American military, Trump was correct to force the hand of Denmark, even though it gave Macron a chance to be a paper tiger.
The government of Denmark are all 🤪 hypocrites and liars. They have never done a damn thing for Denmark and it's people.
The quality of life Danes enjoyed until the late '90's was among the best in the world.
Their high taxes actually paid for excellent free health care and education.
Most of their food was organic.
Then foreign workers were let in, mostly from North Africa.
They were supposed to only stay a year or so and then go home.
Instead, they took advantage of the Danes generosity and brought in their numerous wives and children, refused to leave, then starting complaining about housing, wages, the usual.
One of my oldest friends who is from DK, her dad who worked all his life and earned a very nice pension, suddenly these people were being given all sorts of help and welfare which was more than what her dad was getting. The pensioners from that time were being ripped off.
Many had small vacation homes on the coasts and enjoyed their lives.
Most people could afford a car, despite all the bikes.
Then they started building wind turbines.
There was almost no poverty and no homeless.
The Muslims from North Africa ruined Denmark.
And the stupid trusting people in the government played into their hands.
Greenland on the other hand has been a sore spot for DK since they took it.
The Inuit People who are related to the Inuit in Canada have been treated like 2nd class citizens ever since.
Iceland and Greenland should have their names switched.
Greenland is desolate and Iceland is not.
While traveling I was speaking with a young woman from what had been Yugoslavia. Upon hearing that I was American, she became very tearful and asked why America had destroyed her country? Why did America need to drive wedges between families, friends, and neighbors?
The best answer I could give her is Bill Clinton was president, and I felt great shame saying it. To feel accountable for the crimes of those who claim to represent me, I will never forget that moment.
"A victory for globalists" translates as a disaster for everyone else.
The stupid Eurocrats are still operating under the old Treaty of Westphalia, except when they are the aggressors within Europe. If someone else is the aggressor (like President Trump), then it's all an issue of, "We recognize the known boundaries of nations."
Well, the reason the Balkanization exists as a policy is similar to what exists in the US: Gerrymandering. It's all a matter of trying to re-align the borders to political advantage. The Balkans were an example of that, under the influence of the Ottoman Empire. It was only in the aftermath of World War 1 that Yugoslavia was constructed as a nation-state. And Denmark is still under the impression that they will keep control over Greenland.
Foreign policy credibility collapses under double standards. If NATO intervention in Serbia was justified under humanitarian theory, then European leaders cannot suddenly rediscover absolute sovereignty when Greenland becomes strategically relevant. Either self-determination and geopolitical realism apply consistently, or they are tools of convenience. The U.S. Constitution governs American executive power. That is the constraint on a U.S. president — not selectively invoked international norms. Denmark invokes moral authority today, yet supported interventions that redrew borders in the Balkans. You cannot champion intervention when it suits global consensus and condemn leverage when it serves American interests. Consistency, not outrage, defines legitimacy.
The government of Denmark committed genocide in Greenland, specifically para (d) and para (e) of the Article II.
____________________________________
Article II
In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with
intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as
such:
(a) Killing members of the group;
(b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group;
(c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its
physical destruction in whole or in part;
(d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group;
(e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group.
____________________________________
It is well known that Inuit children were kidnapped, not unlike boys kidnapped by Ottoman Turks in the "blood tax" aka "devshirme" and transferred to another group -- Greenlanders to Danes in Denmark Mainland and Serbs, Croats, Bulgars, Albanians to Anadolian Turkey. That is paragraph (e).
Moreover Denmark FORCEFULLY implanted devices disabling pregnancies in hundreds, possibly thousands of Greenlandic women, some even female children of 15. That is paragraph (d).
Teh difference between Danes and Ottomans is the Danes committed genocide after the Convention for its prevention was long in force, including in Denmark.
Trump would be even wiser if he acknowledged that he is constrained by both The Law of Nations and the Constitution. To suggest anything else is both wrong and hypocritical. "Rules for thee but not for me ' - basically "Might is right" - is no way for a modern, civilized nation to behave.
Law of Nations? Says who? What a joke!
Washington and Franklin?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Law_of_Nations
I guess you're a bot :(
I agree, but it seems only Monaco would fit the bill. Now tell that to the crowds committing violence in our streets that are Muslims trying to kill Jews under the Palestinian flag or the invading aliens out with them in violent riots with mobs pretending to be US citizens or ones that became a citizen only to overthrow the government and eliminate its history and name like La Rasa.
If you feel you can do a better job and solve these and hundreds more then run for President of the USA or at least post them here. Until then you might actually want to say something constructive instead of just bitching. Yes people can also say something constructive to solve a problem having identified the problem but until they do they are just hot gas in the summer heat. At least you're thinking. Try again - do better.
Do I really need to spell it out for you?!
1. Enforce the Constitution.
2. Govern with honesty and integrity.
3. Don't be patronising.