Once a person tries to refute overwhelming evidence, that person now has the burden of proof.
And so far, all of Hunter Biden's claims that attempt to refute the evidence have fallen far short of meeting that burden.
As an example: For him to make claims that those stories were "Russian disinformation" falls far short of refuting that point. One must be mindful that what those "intelligence" officials said was, "This story has all the hallmarks of Russian disinformation." The disingenuous letter signed by those 57 officials never said it was Russian disinformation; they only said it appeared to have those traits. So if Hunter is trying to refute that story, he is, by circling back, saying that it is true.
Also, there is not now, nor has there ever been, any evidence that shows a different provenance for the infamous laptop than what Roger has cited in the article.
Another point about the "Russian disinformation" letter is that the person who was the ringleader in that letter was Antony Blinken, who later was appointed by Hunter's daddy to be Secretary of State. Was that a payback for his organization of the letter? I don't know. But it seems more plausible than any of Hunter's ridiculous statements about the laptop's provenance.
Notice how long it has taken to draft this carefully crafted narrative. Half the country is actively involved in deflection and gas lighting. Empirical evidence makes that task more difficult, hence the elapsed time. Perhaps our side will gain a small percentage of converts that are able to see the ridiculousness of the Biden crime family fiction.
Also, Hunter didn't devise this on his own. The Biden family has a very expensive team of "experts" that are, no doubt, still paid for by the American taxpayer.
God has said that there are six things he hates, seven are an abomination to him. A lying tongue, and bearer of false witness are both mentioned, so truth is evidently the only thing he will tolerate.
Addiction may explain chaos. It does not erase evidence. Recovery may deserve compassion. It does not confer a right to rewrite history. Hunter Biden’s laptop became a national scandal because it exposed real questions about foreign money, family access, influence-peddling, and the Biden name as a business model. The cover-up was almost as important as the contents: Big Tech suppression, media incuriosity, intelligence-community fog, and the reflexive “Russia” label slapped on anything politically inconvenient. Now Hunter wants to replace one failed narrative with another. No. Facts are not flexible because a documentary crew shows up. Emails, texts, photos, financial records, witness testimony, and courtroom evidence do not become “mixed tapes” because the protagonist dislikes the plot. Hunter can tell his story. He cannot make America forget the receipts.
Thank the FBI for keeping the lap top safe and secure. Not one leak out of the FBI regarding. No one cop at the FBI leaked the horrors on Hunter Biden’s lap top. All keep Hunter Biden’s lap top safe and secure.
Why is he ALLOWED to get away with all of it... ??? THAT is the question TRUE American Patriots need to be asking and demanding and answer to. !
Is it perhaps connected to the fact Hunter helped Tucker's son get into an Ivy League College and THEN Tucker's son gets his FIRST ever Job ( and a high level one at that) with JD Vance as Vance gets into the Trump White House ???
The SAME cast of Characters ( In the Deep State Powers That Be) shielding the Biden crimes, Hillary and Obammy's doings .... effectively STILL in power via their plant Vance. ???
Once a person tries to refute overwhelming evidence, that person now has the burden of proof.
And so far, all of Hunter Biden's claims that attempt to refute the evidence have fallen far short of meeting that burden.
As an example: For him to make claims that those stories were "Russian disinformation" falls far short of refuting that point. One must be mindful that what those "intelligence" officials said was, "This story has all the hallmarks of Russian disinformation." The disingenuous letter signed by those 57 officials never said it was Russian disinformation; they only said it appeared to have those traits. So if Hunter is trying to refute that story, he is, by circling back, saying that it is true.
Also, there is not now, nor has there ever been, any evidence that shows a different provenance for the infamous laptop than what Roger has cited in the article.
Another point about the "Russian disinformation" letter is that the person who was the ringleader in that letter was Antony Blinken, who later was appointed by Hunter's daddy to be Secretary of State. Was that a payback for his organization of the letter? I don't know. But it seems more plausible than any of Hunter's ridiculous statements about the laptop's provenance.
Notice how long it has taken to draft this carefully crafted narrative. Half the country is actively involved in deflection and gas lighting. Empirical evidence makes that task more difficult, hence the elapsed time. Perhaps our side will gain a small percentage of converts that are able to see the ridiculousness of the Biden crime family fiction.
Also, Hunter didn't devise this on his own. The Biden family has a very expensive team of "experts" that are, no doubt, still paid for by the American taxpayer.
So now you were involved with Hunter’s laptop according to him? That’s a new one on me. Does he really think that people are going to believe him?
He’s mustering the ActBlue and No Kings dolts.
God has said that there are six things he hates, seven are an abomination to him. A lying tongue, and bearer of false witness are both mentioned, so truth is evidently the only thing he will tolerate.
Addiction may explain chaos. It does not erase evidence. Recovery may deserve compassion. It does not confer a right to rewrite history. Hunter Biden’s laptop became a national scandal because it exposed real questions about foreign money, family access, influence-peddling, and the Biden name as a business model. The cover-up was almost as important as the contents: Big Tech suppression, media incuriosity, intelligence-community fog, and the reflexive “Russia” label slapped on anything politically inconvenient. Now Hunter wants to replace one failed narrative with another. No. Facts are not flexible because a documentary crew shows up. Emails, texts, photos, financial records, witness testimony, and courtroom evidence do not become “mixed tapes” because the protagonist dislikes the plot. Hunter can tell his story. He cannot make America forget the receipts.
Can you not sue him for defamation?
Thank the FBI for keeping the lap top safe and secure. Not one leak out of the FBI regarding. No one cop at the FBI leaked the horrors on Hunter Biden’s lap top. All keep Hunter Biden’s lap top safe and secure.
Father and son is pure cancer to our country
That creep is the smartest guy some doddering old moron knows — high praise indeed.
Why is he ALLOWED to get away with all of it... ??? THAT is the question TRUE American Patriots need to be asking and demanding and answer to. !
Is it perhaps connected to the fact Hunter helped Tucker's son get into an Ivy League College and THEN Tucker's son gets his FIRST ever Job ( and a high level one at that) with JD Vance as Vance gets into the Trump White House ???
The SAME cast of Characters ( In the Deep State Powers That Be) shielding the Biden crimes, Hillary and Obammy's doings .... effectively STILL in power via their plant Vance. ???
I'm just asking questions ( Insert Tucker's Insane/maniacal laugh here. )