Hard evidence that someone with the CIA worked with Oswald in the week (three days) before the assassination.
In fact - no one knew Oswald and JFK would even be in the same city until five weeks before the assassination. The trip was determined on October 1, the day or so when he was laving Mexico City . He did not get a job at the Book…
Hard evidence that someone with the CIA worked with Oswald in the week (three days) before the assassination.
In fact - no one knew Oswald and JFK would even be in the same city until five weeks before the assassination. The trip was determined on October 1, the day or so when he was laving Mexico City . He did not get a job at the Book Depository until two weeks later. And even then it was no guarantee he would get the job or stay at the job. So how did the CIA fix all this without a trace?
And why did they let him be captured by the Dallas PD?
If you watch the Zapruder film in very slow motion, you will see that as the bullet that killed JFK hit him,a narrow plume of what appears to be blood and perhaps other liquid ejects from his head in an upward direction and about 45 degrees to his right front.
Which tells me that the vector force of the bullet that hit him and caused t this ejected plume came from one of only two possible directions. Either from his left rear below his head and heading in an upward trajectory, or from his front right above his head heading in a downward trajectory.
Oswald's alleged perch inthe book depository does not conform with either of these two places where the shot could have come from. The only way the shot could have come from JFK's left rear is if there was a gunman in the open space to the left of the motorcade, which is highly unlikely as the shooter would have been seen. The only other possible place for the shot to have originated was behind the wall of the grassy knoll.
Which means that Oswald could not have been the only shooter. Whatever group planned the attack was the group that enlisted Oswald, if Oswald was even part of the plot. And to maintain plausible deniability if Oswald talked before he could be silenced, whoever enlisted Oswald likely did not reveal to him the true identity of the group, and used some alias to identify who they were.
Which means Oswald could possibly have been working with the Agency without ever knowing it.
Hard evidence that someone with the CIA worked with Oswald in the week (three days) before the assassination.
In fact - no one knew Oswald and JFK would even be in the same city until five weeks before the assassination. The trip was determined on October 1, the day or so when he was laving Mexico City . He did not get a job at the Book Depository until two weeks later. And even then it was no guarantee he would get the job or stay at the job. So how did the CIA fix all this without a trace?
And why did they let him be captured by the Dallas PD?
There are no answers with any evidence for this.
You're straying into histrionics and missing over fifty years of research on the subject.
Are you related to Earl Warren or something? What gives? You're spouting off like it's 1964.
And this isn't just about the Assassination.
It's about theories without facts, and misinformation.
I'm spouting off with facts.
So far no one has quoted a single piece of hard evidence supporting a CIA conspiracy or disproving Oswald as the lone gunman.
fifty years of research and not a single piece of evidence regarding the actual crime. that should bother you.
If you watch the Zapruder film in very slow motion, you will see that as the bullet that killed JFK hit him,a narrow plume of what appears to be blood and perhaps other liquid ejects from his head in an upward direction and about 45 degrees to his right front.
Which tells me that the vector force of the bullet that hit him and caused t this ejected plume came from one of only two possible directions. Either from his left rear below his head and heading in an upward trajectory, or from his front right above his head heading in a downward trajectory.
Oswald's alleged perch inthe book depository does not conform with either of these two places where the shot could have come from. The only way the shot could have come from JFK's left rear is if there was a gunman in the open space to the left of the motorcade, which is highly unlikely as the shooter would have been seen. The only other possible place for the shot to have originated was behind the wall of the grassy knoll.
Which means that Oswald could not have been the only shooter. Whatever group planned the attack was the group that enlisted Oswald, if Oswald was even part of the plot. And to maintain plausible deniability if Oswald talked before he could be silenced, whoever enlisted Oswald likely did not reveal to him the true identity of the group, and used some alias to identify who they were.
Which means Oswald could possibly have been working with the Agency without ever knowing it.
Give me one fact -- one fact -- that you have spouted that isn't your mere assertion that "there are no facts."
You could have shut me up with one bit of hard evidence that Oswald did not work alone.
One minute.
But that is not possible.