Matt:
I'll settle for hard evidence and close.
Say whatever. you want. But I would bet a lot of money - a real lot of money - you won't close with a single bit of hard evidence that Oswald did notice alone or that the CIA worked with him on Nov.22. you have the luxury that I will not rebut your next comment.
See if you can keep it out …
Say whatever. you want. But I would bet a lot of money - a real lot of money - you won't close with a single bit of hard evidence that Oswald did notice alone or that the CIA worked with him on Nov.22. you have the luxury that I will not rebut your next comment.
See if you can keep it out of name calling - because I know you can't cite anything that is not hearsay, theory or misinformation. With 50 years of research to back you up.
Matt:
I'll settle for hard evidence and close.
Say whatever. you want. But I would bet a lot of money - a real lot of money - you won't close with a single bit of hard evidence that Oswald did notice alone or that the CIA worked with him on Nov.22. you have the luxury that I will not rebut your next comment.
See if you can keep it out of name calling - because I know you can't cite anything that is not hearsay, theory or misinformation. With 50 years of research to back you up.
I didn't call you any names.
And the "luxury" you presume to grant me now, of not rebutting me, is a pleasure I have enjoyed throughout this experience.
I know you didn't - I'm sorry if I gave the impression you did.
You didn't resort to the same tactic as SD.
Sorry.