I first became aware of vaccine damages when I got my Alumni Magazine from one of the top 5 universities in the country. Suddenly all these very smart people were having children with all kinds of problems. It was constantly in every monthly update. How could this be? This was before the internet and sharing of info. I felt strongly something was wrong. Soon the culprit emerged when I discovered these children were getting too many shots. This was 40 years ago. Time to stop this.
Respectfully, there’s no fixing the 1986 Act because it’s unconstitutional on a number of levels. The text of the U.S. Constitution 7th Amendment: “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, THE RIGHT OF TRIAL BY JURY SHALL BE PRESERVED, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the RULES OF THE COMMON LAW.” ….. The text of the 5th Amendment: “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence [sic] to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, NOR BE DEPRIVED OF LIFE, LIBERTY, OR PROPERTY, WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” ….. The text of the 10th Amendment: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” ….. And, finally, the text of the 9th Amendment: “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” ….. So, the American Acts of Congress (*1986* and PREP) that removed vaccine manufacturer liability and setup the “vaccine court” that operate without a jury trial 1) Unconstitutionally denies a plaintiff the right to due process by the standards of common law (5th); 2) Unconstitutionally denies a plaintiff the right to a jury trial (7th); 3) Unconstitutionally denies the right of the people, or the several states, to establish their own tort law and pursue material recompense according to common law tradition (10th); and 4) Unconstitutionally usurps the right of the people in these matters as a consequence of Congress exercising a real or imagined enumerated power (9th). Moreover, Article III, Section 2 clearly does NOT grant the SCOTUS and its inferior courts the power to adjudicate intrastate controversies between two or more private parties, such as a vaccine injured v. a vaccine manufacturer doing business within the same state….. All of this is completely obvious, so the only question is: How has this peculiar institution managed to survive challenge for 40 years? The writing is on the wall. Federal liability protection is the new legal hot potato (see glyphosate, see Boulder v. Oil, see Section 230, etc.) that is becoming less and less tenable as every sector of the economy wants their own federal shield, too. That’s why the battle is moving to each state capital and why the federal government needs to do a Dobbs and get out of the liability protection (and product recommendation) business. Repeal 1986. Repeal PREP. They’re constitutionally indefensible.
Until the 1986 vaccine laws are rescinded and the prep act and EUA are destroyed, the people of this country will have no peace. The DC Cesspool will be able to fully wreck havoc across the country using deadly and disfunctional vaccines and mRNA poisons.
This is one of those rare issues where principle and politics actually align. You don’t have to be anti-anything to demand accountability when something goes wrong. If a system promises compensation for injury, then it has to follow through—period. Restoring trust isn’t about messaging; it’s about action. The longer institutions appear insulated from consequences, the more skepticism grows. Fixing that doesn’t weaken the system—it strengthens it. And politically, it’s smart: protect families, maintain access, and enforce accountability. That’s a winning combination if it’s handled honestly. The real question is whether anyone’s willing to follow through when it counts.
Very wary of this change. Why unleash the trial lawyers with their greedy paws. Why do we have those laws protecting the drug companies? Because they threatened to stop making vaccines here.
MRNA vaccines maim and kill yet still on the market injected into American children too.
Why?
Name your source for this claim
I first became aware of vaccine damages when I got my Alumni Magazine from one of the top 5 universities in the country. Suddenly all these very smart people were having children with all kinds of problems. It was constantly in every monthly update. How could this be? This was before the internet and sharing of info. I felt strongly something was wrong. Soon the culprit emerged when I discovered these children were getting too many shots. This was 40 years ago. Time to stop this.
The only thing I’ll be happy with is informed consent/freedom of choice for all…as it should be!
Good thought. Have a chat with your friend, our President DJT. He’ll listen to you.
Respectfully, there’s no fixing the 1986 Act because it’s unconstitutional on a number of levels. The text of the U.S. Constitution 7th Amendment: “In Suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, THE RIGHT OF TRIAL BY JURY SHALL BE PRESERVED, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any Court of the United States, than according to the RULES OF THE COMMON LAW.” ….. The text of the 5th Amendment: “No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence [sic] to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, NOR BE DEPRIVED OF LIFE, LIBERTY, OR PROPERTY, WITHOUT DUE PROCESS OF LAW; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.” ….. The text of the 10th Amendment: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” ….. And, finally, the text of the 9th Amendment: “The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.” ….. So, the American Acts of Congress (*1986* and PREP) that removed vaccine manufacturer liability and setup the “vaccine court” that operate without a jury trial 1) Unconstitutionally denies a plaintiff the right to due process by the standards of common law (5th); 2) Unconstitutionally denies a plaintiff the right to a jury trial (7th); 3) Unconstitutionally denies the right of the people, or the several states, to establish their own tort law and pursue material recompense according to common law tradition (10th); and 4) Unconstitutionally usurps the right of the people in these matters as a consequence of Congress exercising a real or imagined enumerated power (9th). Moreover, Article III, Section 2 clearly does NOT grant the SCOTUS and its inferior courts the power to adjudicate intrastate controversies between two or more private parties, such as a vaccine injured v. a vaccine manufacturer doing business within the same state….. All of this is completely obvious, so the only question is: How has this peculiar institution managed to survive challenge for 40 years? The writing is on the wall. Federal liability protection is the new legal hot potato (see glyphosate, see Boulder v. Oil, see Section 230, etc.) that is becoming less and less tenable as every sector of the economy wants their own federal shield, too. That’s why the battle is moving to each state capital and why the federal government needs to do a Dobbs and get out of the liability protection (and product recommendation) business. Repeal 1986. Repeal PREP. They’re constitutionally indefensible.
Until the 1986 vaccine laws are rescinded and the prep act and EUA are destroyed, the people of this country will have no peace. The DC Cesspool will be able to fully wreck havoc across the country using deadly and disfunctional vaccines and mRNA poisons.
This is one of those rare issues where principle and politics actually align. You don’t have to be anti-anything to demand accountability when something goes wrong. If a system promises compensation for injury, then it has to follow through—period. Restoring trust isn’t about messaging; it’s about action. The longer institutions appear insulated from consequences, the more skepticism grows. Fixing that doesn’t weaken the system—it strengthens it. And politically, it’s smart: protect families, maintain access, and enforce accountability. That’s a winning combination if it’s handled honestly. The real question is whether anyone’s willing to follow through when it counts.
Very wary of this change. Why unleash the trial lawyers with their greedy paws. Why do we have those laws protecting the drug companies? Because they threatened to stop making vaccines here.