Roger Stone’s point is obvious: imagine this case with Trump’s name attached. The media would run documentaries, congressional specials, front-page timelines, Netflix series, and daily “democracy in crisis” panels. But because the beneficiary was Obama’s 2012 campaign—and because Obama himself was not charged or shown to have knowingly directed the scheme—the story gets buried in the back pages. Fine, keep the legal distinctions clean. Obama was not charged. But foreign money was illegally routed into his reelection operation, according to the convictions. The same press that hallucinated Russian collusion treated this real case like a clerical error. That is the scandal.
I can't imagine that it would happen with Trump's name attached at all. This common TDS I have been immune to from the beginning - from the escalator.
I personally find it surprising that I'm so comfortable and confident..... I'm often quite the skeptic.
2016 was inspiring and that win we celebrated in big ways. Felt entirely new and I'm still invigorated. Maybe for a deep desire to see consequence and accountability (for Hussein especially,) I'm practical and a realist. And even if I don't see the rain fall hard and flood, I still trust and haven't faltered. I'm in it to win.
So Massie being taken down by Zionist donor money is okay? That is foreign influence, regardless of where they reside. Kind of like Omar claiming she is a Congresswoman when her loyalties are with Somalia and financial fraud schemes.
You sound like you might have a "river to the sea" sign in a closet. Enough with the hate Israel nonsense. Massie lost because the Republican establishment no longer controls the narrative. Massie was exposed for the rotten egg that he always was. If foreign money was involved, it's an entirely separate issue.
Roger continues to beg Americans to open their eyes. The American communist takeover has been happening for decades and most Americans ignore it while trading their integrity for a shorter drive-through line at Starbucks every day. Wake the fuck up America before you’re speaking, Mandarin in the Starbucks drive-through line.
For many Americans skeptical of the political establishment, concerns about election manipulation did not begin with Barack Obama’s presidency. They argue that growing distrust stems from decades of insider influence, powerful donor networks, media narratives, and political institutions that often appear disconnected from voters. In that view, candidates such as John McCain and Mitt Romney were either establishment-approved contenders destined to lose—much like the Washington Generals facing the Harlem Globetrotters—or legitimate candidates caught in a system increasingly shaped by forces beyond ordinary citizens’ control. Regardless of which interpretation proves correct, the deeper concern is that public confidence in election integrity has steadily eroded for years.
Roger Stone’s point is obvious: imagine this case with Trump’s name attached. The media would run documentaries, congressional specials, front-page timelines, Netflix series, and daily “democracy in crisis” panels. But because the beneficiary was Obama’s 2012 campaign—and because Obama himself was not charged or shown to have knowingly directed the scheme—the story gets buried in the back pages. Fine, keep the legal distinctions clean. Obama was not charged. But foreign money was illegally routed into his reelection operation, according to the convictions. The same press that hallucinated Russian collusion treated this real case like a clerical error. That is the scandal.
Precisely
I can't imagine that it would happen with Trump's name attached at all. This common TDS I have been immune to from the beginning - from the escalator.
I personally find it surprising that I'm so comfortable and confident..... I'm often quite the skeptic.
2016 was inspiring and that win we celebrated in big ways. Felt entirely new and I'm still invigorated. Maybe for a deep desire to see consequence and accountability (for Hussein especially,) I'm practical and a realist. And even if I don't see the rain fall hard and flood, I still trust and haven't faltered. I'm in it to win.
So Massie being taken down by Zionist donor money is okay? That is foreign influence, regardless of where they reside. Kind of like Omar claiming she is a Congresswoman when her loyalties are with Somalia and financial fraud schemes.
You sound like you might have a "river to the sea" sign in a closet. Enough with the hate Israel nonsense. Massie lost because the Republican establishment no longer controls the narrative. Massie was exposed for the rotten egg that he always was. If foreign money was involved, it's an entirely separate issue.
I am blocked
Roger continues to beg Americans to open their eyes. The American communist takeover has been happening for decades and most Americans ignore it while trading their integrity for a shorter drive-through line at Starbucks every day. Wake the fuck up America before you’re speaking, Mandarin in the Starbucks drive-through line.
For many Americans skeptical of the political establishment, concerns about election manipulation did not begin with Barack Obama’s presidency. They argue that growing distrust stems from decades of insider influence, powerful donor networks, media narratives, and political institutions that often appear disconnected from voters. In that view, candidates such as John McCain and Mitt Romney were either establishment-approved contenders destined to lose—much like the Washington Generals facing the Harlem Globetrotters—or legitimate candidates caught in a system increasingly shaped by forces beyond ordinary citizens’ control. Regardless of which interpretation proves correct, the deeper concern is that public confidence in election integrity has steadily eroded for years.
What do you do when most politicians think taking foreign money is ok?