1 Comment
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Knight Templar's avatar

Intriguing.

Deep State gets mentioned a lot nowadays.

Europe: for centuries, Christians made usury punishable by death.

Mayer Amschel Rothschild banker didn't know how to indenture Christian countries without risking Christian wrath, even if wealthy Christians were lending to governments.

The sons established the 5 Houses of Rothschild banking: Paris, Frankfurt, Vienna, Naples, London.

After the funding the French Revolution (Christian aristocrats wouldn't allow the Jewish bankers to offer bonds to the government, so the aristocracy were guillotined), things went farther than the Rothschild bankers thought, what with the public running things. Paris House of Rothschild funded Napoleon and London House funded Wellington. Whomever wins, the Rothschild bankers get paid, and supposedly Napoleon's dictatorship would quell the French public's demands for liberty, equality and fraternity.

The goal of the Houses of Rothschild is to keep the public distracted by periodically getting the government to threaten a right of the public, so that they become very emotional about their rights, all the while increasing government debt without risk of default on debt service, until the interest payments on the debt alone are astronomical.

If the public is not distracted, the Jewish Rothschild's feared usury charges and being forced back out of the lending circle.

Other false flags to distract the public from the ever-increasing debt? Over 140 years ago, Frenchman Ernest Renan proposed differences between Semitic and Aryan races to explain differences in societies. A Jewish researcher resented that Jews were lumped together with others in the Semitic languages, rather than Jews being considered similar to Aryans. This Jewish researcher coined the term "anti-Semitic."

Hitler's propaganda machine seemed to do more than just divide Aryans and Semites, it was restricting the normally broad categories of both Aryan and Semite. In more recent times, particularly because of the unrest from the unprecedented amount of yearly interest payments on government debt in many countries, the term "anti-Semitic" has lost all meaning, so that it replaces "anti-Jewish" or "anti-Jewish banker". The term is used by government presidents, chancellors, etc., to impose restrictions on the rights of the public to redress grievances. Many of these politicians are in the hip pockets of very wealthy bankers.

War also increases government debt while distracting the public from the schemes of globalist bankers, so it appears that there is no end to war.

Expand full comment