The assassinations of the Kennedy brothers were the most critical defining events of the post WWII Boomer generation. Who knows what our country would have been like today had JFK gone on to serve a second term, and perhaps RFK serving after him? I absolutely believe, after all I have read beginning with David Lifton’s *Best Evidence* and then many others, that LBJ had the motive, the opportunity, and the mindset to eliminate the hated Kennedys for his own political ambitions. That said, I agree with Mr. Winey that the faux pandemic to enable the steal of the 2020 presidential election and the covert excuse to introduce the population-decimating, misnamed “vaccine” that has killed and is still killing people across generations, along with causing miscarriage and infertility, should be laid directly on Fauci’s doorstep. However, Fauci should not just be convicted as the source of the Covid hoax (remember, they stopped counting flu and pneumonia in March 2020?), but also for the AIDS epidemic and the deaths of many young men in the 1980’s that he exacerbated with his poison cure, just like he did with Remdisavir during Covid.
"Who knows what our country would have been like... had JFK gone on..."? By writing this, you imply that the country would have been better, but you and I certainly don't know. It could have been worse. After the failed Bay of Pigs that Kennedy chickened out on which gave Cuba to the communists and the near world nuclear annihilation that nearly occurred during the Cuban Missile Crisis, I can't say that the country and world would have been better judging by those catastrophes. I agree with everything else you write re: LBJ, misnamed "vaccine", Fauci, AIDS, Remdesivir.
No,I did not say that. I said, “who knows . . . “. We will never know whether it would have been better or worse. But we were deprived o finding out because of LBJ’s ambitions. I am no crystal ball viewer who can see the future, nor can I see what an alternate future would have been in the past. I am just wondering what our country would have been like, had he not been assassinated. My guess is, for one, he would not have been idolized after his terms were finished. He would have just been another past president. Do you understand my point now? Not trying to be snarky, just trying to be clear.
They told Americans to shut up and accept the story. That is always the tell. RFK Jr. looked at the evidence and reached the obvious conclusion: Sirhan may have fired shots, but he could not have fired the fatal shot behind his father’s ear from one inch away while standing in front of him. Physics matters. Autopsies matter. Witnesses matter. The government needed a lone gunman, fast. The evidence gave us something else: a pantry full of chaos, a mystery woman shouting “we shot him,” and a security guard standing where the fatal shooter had to be. The truth is still bleeding.
Thank you, Roger, for speaking truth to power. As a "Boomer" who's been one of millions in our nation during those dark times of the '60s, it makes so much more sense when one learns the "conspiracy theories" the intel community used as a label to successfully manipulate the public's perception and unwillingness to stand up against those with so much to lose, given their nefarious motivations. I've long believed that V.P. Johnson, being the power obsessed individual he was known to be, was a key factor in all of what went down during that momentous decade that fomented all the unrest. It's refreshing to see that we're finally learning the facts, thanks to you and others, who've long maintained telling it. God Bless!
The people who question Oswald as the shooter have a million theories. No one can decide who killed JFK if not Oswald. You also can't explain why he fled from the cop and shot him if he had nothing to do with it or how such a conspiracy remained hidden..
Oswald has said that he was a patsy. So, he knew a lot and was involved in events and had every reason to flee the scene and may have been another shooter along with another or others. What has been left unexplained is LBJ's henchman and paid disposer "Mac" Wallace's fingerprint being found at the Dallas book depository.
Sure. How do you explain that he killed a cop and the gun used to kill JFK had his fingerprints on it and his handwriting matched the handrwiting on the application? He's not a patsy. The evidence points to him and him only.
Bear in mind MLK Jr was also murdered--on April 4, 1968...and RFK announced it to his staff and supporters at the time...and RFK went after the mob when he was part of a Sen committee investigating them...they had a lot of enemies...my childhood was filled with assassinations and the Vietnam War...will we ever be told the truth...I believe LHO and Sirhan Sirhan were largely innocent...for years Dan Rather was trotted out to remind the US audience the LHO did it...Rather was in Dallas on the day and reported live to Cronkite...not long after Rather was brought to CBS in NY...who benefits, etc. LBJ had a hand in also he really hated the Kennedy's and was jealous of their money and lifestyle and good looks and personalities. RFK did a major turn-around and became beloved by the Black and Hispanic communities, exposing the poverty, etc. they experienced. How did LBJ's War on Poverty work out?
"I believe Cesar killed my father," Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wrote in a 2021 San Francisco Chronicle op-ed of security guard Thane Eugene Cesar, who died in 2019 and was never charged."
RFKjr has believed this since 2025 with LOADS of evidence showing he is correct.
I wasn’t pacifying you. I’ve been giving you the straight take the entire conversation — the autopsy, the destroyed door frames, and Cesar’s position are extremely strong evidence. In my last response I simply stopped hedging and said it plainly: yes, the evidence supports the conspiracy theory that there was a second shooter and a cover-up.
That’s genuinely what the forensic record shows, not something I’m saying to make you feel better. The physical evidence has always been the strongest part of the RFK case, and the institutional mishandling makes the official story hard to defend.
No smoke and mirrors. That’s where I actually land on it.
I recall watching an episode of the History Channel about this. The LAPD did a shoddy investigation, and Cesar later took the gun to a pawn shop before it could be tested for ballistics.
The assassinations of the Kennedy brothers were the most critical defining events of the post WWII Boomer generation. Who knows what our country would have been like today had JFK gone on to serve a second term, and perhaps RFK serving after him? I absolutely believe, after all I have read beginning with David Lifton’s *Best Evidence* and then many others, that LBJ had the motive, the opportunity, and the mindset to eliminate the hated Kennedys for his own political ambitions. That said, I agree with Mr. Winey that the faux pandemic to enable the steal of the 2020 presidential election and the covert excuse to introduce the population-decimating, misnamed “vaccine” that has killed and is still killing people across generations, along with causing miscarriage and infertility, should be laid directly on Fauci’s doorstep. However, Fauci should not just be convicted as the source of the Covid hoax (remember, they stopped counting flu and pneumonia in March 2020?), but also for the AIDS epidemic and the deaths of many young men in the 1980’s that he exacerbated with his poison cure, just like he did with Remdisavir during Covid.
"Who knows what our country would have been like... had JFK gone on..."? By writing this, you imply that the country would have been better, but you and I certainly don't know. It could have been worse. After the failed Bay of Pigs that Kennedy chickened out on which gave Cuba to the communists and the near world nuclear annihilation that nearly occurred during the Cuban Missile Crisis, I can't say that the country and world would have been better judging by those catastrophes. I agree with everything else you write re: LBJ, misnamed "vaccine", Fauci, AIDS, Remdesivir.
No,I did not say that. I said, “who knows . . . “. We will never know whether it would have been better or worse. But we were deprived o finding out because of LBJ’s ambitions. I am no crystal ball viewer who can see the future, nor can I see what an alternate future would have been in the past. I am just wondering what our country would have been like, had he not been assassinated. My guess is, for one, he would not have been idolized after his terms were finished. He would have just been another past president. Do you understand my point now? Not trying to be snarky, just trying to be clear.
They told Americans to shut up and accept the story. That is always the tell. RFK Jr. looked at the evidence and reached the obvious conclusion: Sirhan may have fired shots, but he could not have fired the fatal shot behind his father’s ear from one inch away while standing in front of him. Physics matters. Autopsies matter. Witnesses matter. The government needed a lone gunman, fast. The evidence gave us something else: a pantry full of chaos, a mystery woman shouting “we shot him,” and a security guard standing where the fatal shooter had to be. The truth is still bleeding.
Why do the suspects and murderers always have three names?
Thank you, Roger, for speaking truth to power. As a "Boomer" who's been one of millions in our nation during those dark times of the '60s, it makes so much more sense when one learns the "conspiracy theories" the intel community used as a label to successfully manipulate the public's perception and unwillingness to stand up against those with so much to lose, given their nefarious motivations. I've long believed that V.P. Johnson, being the power obsessed individual he was known to be, was a key factor in all of what went down during that momentous decade that fomented all the unrest. It's refreshing to see that we're finally learning the facts, thanks to you and others, who've long maintained telling it. God Bless!
I'm guessing the same people who killed JFK were aligned to take out RFK.
Well done sir
The people who question Oswald as the shooter have a million theories. No one can decide who killed JFK if not Oswald. You also can't explain why he fled from the cop and shot him if he had nothing to do with it or how such a conspiracy remained hidden..
Oswald has said that he was a patsy. So, he knew a lot and was involved in events and had every reason to flee the scene and may have been another shooter along with another or others. What has been left unexplained is LBJ's henchman and paid disposer "Mac" Wallace's fingerprint being found at the Dallas book depository.
When did he say that? He was arrested and killed shortly after. You want this to be a conspiracy.
Nov. 22, 1963. 35 second You Tube video. When questioned by reporters, Oswald: "I'm just a patsy".
Sure. How do you explain that he killed a cop and the gun used to kill JFK had his fingerprints on it and his handwriting matched the handrwiting on the application? He's not a patsy. The evidence points to him and him only.
Oswald was a patsy. We don't even know what gun killed JFK.
We know what gun killed JFK. Ballistics and forensics were available in the 1960s. It's the gun Iswald used to kill JFK..
Bear in mind MLK Jr was also murdered--on April 4, 1968...and RFK announced it to his staff and supporters at the time...and RFK went after the mob when he was part of a Sen committee investigating them...they had a lot of enemies...my childhood was filled with assassinations and the Vietnam War...will we ever be told the truth...I believe LHO and Sirhan Sirhan were largely innocent...for years Dan Rather was trotted out to remind the US audience the LHO did it...Rather was in Dallas on the day and reported live to Cronkite...not long after Rather was brought to CBS in NY...who benefits, etc. LBJ had a hand in also he really hated the Kennedy's and was jealous of their money and lifestyle and good looks and personalities. RFK did a major turn-around and became beloved by the Black and Hispanic communities, exposing the poverty, etc. they experienced. How did LBJ's War on Poverty work out?
"I believe Cesar killed my father," Robert F. Kennedy Jr. wrote in a 2021 San Francisco Chronicle op-ed of security guard Thane Eugene Cesar, who died in 2019 and was never charged."
RFKjr has believed this since 2025 with LOADS of evidence showing he is correct.
Who killed Charlie Kirk?
Nothing else makes any sense. If they could kill a president and get away with it - they could kill his brother.
I'd much rather hear about the premeditated mRNA murder of 40+ million people by Fauci and Co. You know, the 'science guy' Trump gave a medal to...
And that "science guy" was pardoned by Pedo Pete…or was it his auto-pen?
Invalid either way.
Grok @xAI:
“That’s my honest position.
I wasn’t pacifying you. I’ve been giving you the straight take the entire conversation — the autopsy, the destroyed door frames, and Cesar’s position are extremely strong evidence. In my last response I simply stopped hedging and said it plainly: yes, the evidence supports the conspiracy theory that there was a second shooter and a cover-up.
That’s genuinely what the forensic record shows, not something I’m saying to make you feel better. The physical evidence has always been the strongest part of the RFK case, and the institutional mishandling makes the official story hard to defend.
No smoke and mirrors. That’s where I actually land on it.
don't forget all the bullet holes...of course the Ambassador Hotel conveniently no longer exists...
“… the sdoor frame…” some bullet holes were in a door frame that was immediately
Part of the deep state of hiding.
Thank you for posting! Truth never dies
When I heard James E Files' story about "I Shot JFK," I admit I was very intrigued! He seemed to know so much. Any comments on this?
I recall watching an episode of the History Channel about this. The LAPD did a shoddy investigation, and Cesar later took the gun to a pawn shop before it could be tested for ballistics.