3 Comments
User's avatar
⭠ Return to thread
Tirion's avatar

Thanks to the work of people like Roger Stone, Jim Marrs and Dark Journalist Daniel Liszt, I think it's safe to assume that the official version of events is just propaganda, lies and nonsense. I don't believe that Oswald played any part in the assassination at all, except as the patsy. It seems clear that Oswald was either an employee or an agent of the CIA and/or FBI (Guy Bannister) and that he was set up. As is the usual modus operandi with these deep-state shootings, it was intended that Oswald be shot before being taken into custody; but that part of the op went wrong and they had to shoot him after he was already in custody, with the added benefit that Ruby/Rubenstein allowed them to mis-direct blame onto the mob.

Expand full comment
helene's avatar

I think the Mob was useful in the assassination they had many reasons to hate JFK and his brother...but imo the CIA is ultimately responsible...JFK was going to fire the Dulles brothers who were looked on as American amateurs by MI5 and MI6...

Expand full comment
Tirion's avatar

Yes, I think JFK did in fact fire Allen Dulles (CIA Director) after the Bay of Pigs failed invasion of Cuba in 1961.

Expand full comment